When I was young I used to like to eat apples. We would go to the tree and pick the apples
that we could reach, but when we picked all the apples below, we had to climb
the tree and go down the branches in order to get the apples.
The same principle applies to family history. When we use Family
Tree to find individuals in need of ordinances, especially for those of us who
are descendants of the early LDS pioneers,
we find most, if not all, of the ordinances have been completed.
My
grandparents and great grandparents were active in collecting genealogy and
having the ordinances performed for many of the ancestors. They went up the family tree and got as many
ancestors and their families as was possible for their era.
Think
about some early member who had a number of children. They may have as many as five or six thousand linear descendants
in five generations. If all these
descendants were active members of the church, then there would be very few
ordinances available.
The
solution is to climb the trunk of the family tree for five or six generations
and then go down the branches. Not
every descendant of most family trees was a member of the church or even
associated with the church.
In
my own family I have a third cousin who not only is not a member of the church,
but was amazed that she was a descendant of one of the early Mormon general
authorities.
With
census records on-line and better access to recent records, it is much easier
than finding ancestors in the 16 or 17 hundreds in lands outside the United
States.
There
are records in Family Tree that need ordinances, but most of them are out on
the branches and not near the trunk of the tree. It is our responsibility to find all the apples on the tree.
WOW, I really like this analogy. I've been really struggling with this issue because I do have some names on my mother's side, but I don't know if I should do them because they are not DIRECT LINE ANCESTORS. But, according to your post, they should be done - if they fall within the 110 year rule. Thanks for this, Laurence...
ReplyDelete