More changes to Family Tree

Alvah Gee
1835 – Deceased • MCS3-75B
is listed as a female
The following is posted in the discussions on this individual:
Relationship to parent: Electa Gates Note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
Person note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
Relationship to parent: Alva Gee Note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
Birth: 1835 prob. Birmington, Vermont Note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
Gender: Female Note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
Name: Alvah Gee Note: This is a duplicate sibling. Alvah is a male. This Alvah is a female -- not accurate.
4 years agobyChuck Golding
Edit|Delete
The correct Alva is
Alvah Julan Gee
21 July 1824 – 19 July 1909 • KJCJ-6XL
I am unable to merge because of the sex difference.
Today I removed the child from both parents,
I do not know if you needed to be aware of this.
Laurence Gee
18 June 1934
 
Ordinances performed under wrong gender patron requests deletion of record. Verified information and submitted to another department for further review. Email was sent to patron. 

They responded:

Dear Ivin Laurence Gee,

RE:  Alvah Gee  MCS3-75B 
Thank you for contacting Family Search Support and bringing your concern to our attention.  The record listing the incorrect gender no longer displays in Family Tree. 
 

Sincerely, 

Family Search Data Administration 

Now the record is correct.